AT&T Fails at Trolling

When goliath AT&T went mano-a-mano with a tiny site called 4chan.org, perhaps AT&T didn’t realize what it’s like to start a fight online. Things have gone from bad to worse to downright despicable ever since AT&T, in a move it said was meant to protect one of its customers from a Web-based attack, blocked access to the 4chan site. Here is what happened.

On Sunday AT&T blocked access to portions of 4chan.org, an image-board Web site that allows users to post uncensored images and content anonymously. Soon after the blockade was detected by 4chan.org its founder Christopher “Moot” Poole posted a statement to the 4chan site complaining about AT&T’s actions and urged 4chan users to “call or write (AT&T) customer support and (AT&T) corporate immediately” to complain about the blocking.

Next, in a statement posted to its Web site Monday, AT&T claims that one of its customers was affected by a DoS (denial of service) from multiple IP addresses related to the 4chan image-board Web site. AT&T has subsequently lifted the block on 4chan (/b/ & /r9k/) and says it continues to monitor for DoS activity.

Interestingly enough, and raising serious Net neutrality issues, is the fact that Poole claimed on his site’s status blog AT&T never contacted him regarding the blockade. To some 4chan users and Net neutrality advocates the blockade had the appearance that AT&T may be blocking 4chan because of content posted on the site, and not for security issues. That is claim AT&T loudly disputes.

Late on Sunday, sometime midway through the ban, a report surfaced on both CNN iReport and Digg claiming that AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson was dead (thank you Businessinsider for the image ). It’s not clear whether this was a 4chan users prank. The iReport suggested Stephenson was found “delirious” outside his home after a party with “male dancers everywhere and the best blow west of Mississippi.”

The prank report also said Stephenson went into a coma in transit, probably due too massive cocaine use. The CNN iReport was taken down shortly after it emerged, although several hundred users voted for the story on Digg.com. Shortly after, personal contact details of AT&T senior staff appeared online, with users being encouraged to contact them regarding the 4chan block.

In today’s statement, AT&T said it didn’t block 4chan because of the uncensored and unfiltered content it features and insisted malicious traffic was to blame.

Poole has posted an update to the saga on his 4chan site’s blog. He is toning down his rhetoric explaining the AT&T and 4chan blockade was all a big mix up. He explains that in 4chan’s effort to thwart a DDoS attack against 4chan (not AT&T) it unintentionally created the appearance to to AT&T network administrators that it was the source of a DDoS attack. Now Poole says he doesn’t blame AT&T for blocking access to 4chan stating in the blog entry: “In the end, this wasn’t a sinister act of censorship, but rather a bit of a mistake and a poorly executed, disproportionate response on AT&T’s part.”

5 Responses to “AT&T Fails at Trolling”

  1. And once again, it NEVER fails with the incessant lying, as lying is a way of life for these hacker creeps. I salute AT&T for blocking viruses, trojans and nasty spider scripts, as that is what the REAL truth is as to WHY AT&T has flashed the middle finger [blocked] to 4 Chan. Why should AT&T waste time and energy in dealing with viruses, trojans and uncontrollable script programs emanating from the 4 Chan site?

    I don't condone censorship and I certainly don't condone lies "in the name of lulz". The only thing 4 Chan has proven again and again, is that they are infantile and violent. A bunch of two year olds who go on tirades. And just like an out of control two year old, they need some REAL hard slaps from the school of hard knocks.

    Any consequences or denial of internet access to AT&T customers due to NAZI actions emanating from 4 Chan [or any other hacker creeps for that matter], I pray that they are caught, rounded up, prosecuted beyond the extent of the law, thrown in a windowless cell and locked up forever until the day they die.

    I commend AT&T for taking the step forward and I sincerely hope that other ISP'S follow suit ASAP. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. Hackers cause destruction, chaos, waste everyones time and energy. Normal people on the net are SICK AND TIRED of these two year old tantrum antics that 4 Chan displays on a daily basis. These hacker creeps really and truly need to GROW THE F*** UP.

  2. Oh Moot, you could [...] up the world if you asked your troll army to do it.

    Personally this acts as a good reminder to ISPs, people are paying for the whole internet. Not the part some corp. feels like showing them.

  3. I cannot condone any attempt at censoring the internet. Period.

  4. @ Ace:
    GreyHat here, so shut it on the hackers thing. Were the reason you have security your dumbass, it's a trade off between the pros and cons the hacker culture. You need us, even if you don't want us.

    Godwin's Law: nice job. Fastest I've seen it come out. ^__^ Better luck controling yourself in future. And just a btw, convictions to total freedom is not the same as fascism, quite the opposite actually.

    As to other ISPs following suit, they don't want to be sued for censorship, which regretably is how the "land of the free" takes actions that remind us where not to much dissimilar to communist china.

    Facts are fun, Caps Lock is annoying. Also just as a side note. Hacking isn't illegal in most cases. And many of the countries hackers come from it isn't illegal at all. So have fun with YOUR questionable legal process of " rounded up, prosecuted beyond the extent of the law, thrown in a windowless cell and locked up forever until the day they die." for non-crimes. Oh wait, that is facism?

    A pity you probably will not understand the irony.

    @Pixie: I will not continue farther. If you do chose not to ok these, could you at least comment on the irony, I did actualy lol on it.

    ~The Same Anonymous as Above

  5. GreyHat: I try really hard to OK just about any comments left on my sites. Anyone who has been a fan of my pages here should know by now that I'm a big fan of freedom of speech which also inherently gives the right to freedom of retarded speech too.

    What did Anonymous do that was so wrong against AT&T in this case? Spread the obviously silly rumor the CEO died during a gay orgy with a cocaine overdose? If anything it just proves how easily influenced Digg and CNN's and Web 2.0 is.

    Trending topics on Twitter is a great example of this and another thing Anonymous' has taken on.

    This is actually a rather big deal in exposing some of the Elephants in the Room when it comes to the way the internet is developing.

Leave a Reply